J Dentofacial Anom Orthod
Volume 16, Number 3, 2013Mandibular asymmetry
|Number of page(s)||18|
|Published online||24 October 2013|
The use of geometric morphometry to study facial asymmetries: relationship between basicranial shape and maxillofacial and occlusal pathologies
Address for correspondence: J. Faure 10 place Maréchal Lannes, 32000 Auch. email@example.com
Describing an anatomical shape with a landmark points diagram allows the practitioner to use all the tools of geometric morphometry. Using a 14 point trigeminal for maxillofacial morphology, 10 points for basicranial morphology and 6 points for the orbital area, we have been able to identify the specific maxillofacial shapes associated with the major dysplasias (Class II or Class III ‘‘surgical limit’’) or simple malocclusions and to research the possible relationships between basicranial morphologies and maxillofacial morphologies. The asymmetries have thus been linked to other pathologies.
We have compared these results with those obtained by using a three-dimensional cephalometric analysis and with results obtained from the literature.
The conclusions on the epidemiology of the asymmetries are in agreement. Basically, the mandible with dominance of the right hemi-face was confirmed as the causative factor. The stability of the basicranial shape makes a solid case that it is not responsible for maxillofacial or occlusal pathologies.
Key words: Maxillofacial dysplasias / Class II, surgical limit / Class III, surgical limit / Asymmetry / Geometric morphometry / Procruste’s super imposition; 3D analysis
© RODF / EDP Sciences
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.