J Dentofacial Anom Orthod
Volume 13, Number 4, December 2010Varia
|Page(s)||385 - 400|
|Published online||31 May 2011|
A new method for the utilization of cephalometric measurements in orthodontics or how standard deviations can sometimes be the practitioner’s false friends (Part 1)
Address for correspondence: R. BONNEFONT, 149 rue Perronet, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine. firstname.lastname@example.org
Today there is near universal agreement that the cephalometric analyses presented by the Americans Ricketts, Steiner, and Tweed need to be re-evaluated and brought up to date. To this end, our C.R.A.N.I.O.M group has prepared a new method for using cephalometric numerical and angular readings in the preparation of a reasonable and well-reasoned aid to diagnosis.
We analyzed the data from a sample of 83 young adults with Class I occlusions, none of whom had ever received orthodontic treatment.
In our work the most striking new consideration that we employed was to use the extreme values for each variable of this sample. These figures constitute extreme parameter limits very distant from each other: for example there is a gap of 30° between the most buccally inclined incisor and the most lingually, or palatally, inclined.
Therefore, we found incisor inclination to be acceptable within a range of 78 to 114° to Downs’s mandibular plane on the lower arch and from 97.5 to 130.1° to the Frankfort plane for the upper arch. So in our reasoning there is far less need to reposition these teeth in conformity to an arbitrary cephalometric norm.
And, for the same reason, we find far fewer cases requiring extraction in order to allow orthodontists to achieve results that satisfy abusive standards established by Ricketts, Steiner, and Tweed. The osseous measurements that we report simply describe the forms we observed, none of which constitute anomalies but, instead, describe a particular type.
The C.R.A.N.I.O.M group believes that cephalometric analysis occupies a place in orthodontic record taking that comes after those occupied by esthetics, periodontal status, and muscular balance.
Key words: Cephalometrics / Averages / Standard deviations / Extreme values / Inclination of incisors / Facial and mandibular forms / Cephalometric incisal repositioning
© RODF / EDP Sciences
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.